WHICH BRANCH SYSTEM DO YOU PREFER?

This is an archived version of FeralFront. While you can surf through all the content that was ever created on FeralFront, no new content can be created.
If you'd like some free FeralFront memorabilia to look back on fondly, see this thread from Dynamo (if this message is still here, we still have memorabilia): https://feralfront.com/thread/2669184-free-feralfront-memorabilia/.
  • What branch/title system should we use? 15

    1. The first branch system. (6) 40%
    2. The second branch system. (7) 47%
    3. The first branch system without the additional rank names (Councilman etc) (2) 13%
    4. Other (explain) (0) 0%

    So I've been working on a new branch system and I actually have a couple different ideas for it, and one is far more complicated than the other. Things (especially names) may be tweaked, especially to account for your feedback.


    [Center]

    [fancypost bgcolor=transparent; width: 175pt]


    [/fancypost]
    [fancypost bgcolor=transparent; width: 175pt]




    [/fancypost]

    [fancypost bgcolor=transparent]


  • [fancypost borderwidth=0px][justify]Voted!
    In general I really like both of the systems, but I opted for the second for the sake of simplicity/the first might get cluttered with so many rank names n__n


    (I also think Emperor and Nobleman/woman sound best for leader and deputy bc I already know I will never be able to remember Hueyi Tlatoani and Cihuacoatl lmao)


  • [fancypost borderwidth=0; width: 450px; text-align: justify; font-family: arial; font-size: 8pt]Voted + agreeing to what Faux has to say! c:


  • voted
    hhh you always have such good ideas ^:


    Thank you <3



    Really the only reason I included Hueyi Tlatoni and Cihuacoatl was because those are what the Aztecs called those ranks and I thought I should at least include the option of integrating more Aztec culture. The clutter is also why I added another system option.